Click here to start your application. Apply now

Academic Handbook Programme Specifications

BA (Hons) Philosophy Programme Specification

Award and programme title BA (Hons) Philosophy UCAS code PH1L
Programme level Level 6 HECoS code 100337
Relevant QAA benchmark statements Philosophy Programme code LBAPHIL-F
Relevant professional body requirements N/A Language of instruction English
Awarding body Northeastern University London Date approved To be completed by the Quality Team
Mode of study Full-time Duration of study 3 years

Aims

This programme aims to combine rigorous study of Philosophy with a personalised elective pathway that complements (deepens, broadens, contextualises) those studies in line with the student’s values, interests, or goals.

Philosophy is concerned with fundamental questions about, among other topics, the nature of reality, what we can know, how we should act, the basis of politics, the principles of aesthetic evaluation, methodological questions concerning the sciences, and the principles of inference. The study of Philosophy cultivates an approach to such topics driven by rigorous argument.

The programme is designed with the aim that in pursuing their studies each student also gains core competencies (e.g. writing across audiences and genres; employing ethical reasoning; analysing and using data; integrating knowledge and skills through experience) that empower them for sustained impact, success, and self-actualisation.

Structure and Requirements

The degree regulations require that students take courses to the value of 360 credits across three years, with at most 120 credits at L4, and at least 90 credits at L6.

Options and Electives

By definition: an ‘option’ is a course that a student on the programme is not required to take but that they may take in order to fulfil a discipline-specific requirement; whereas ‘electives’ are any other (non-required) courses that the student may take to fulfil the wider, overall, programme requirements.

Choosing Options or Electives

Students will be asked to select options and/or electives in advance of each new academic year, and in this process will receive dedicated support and guidance from Academic Advisors, who will also connect them with faculty as appropriate.

*University Courses List Condition

The optional/elective courses that run in each academic year are subject to change in line with faculty availability and student demand, and may be capped or be unavailable in the timetable, so there is no guarantee every optional / elective course will be available every year. Where a course is set to run, students for whom it is an option will typically be given priority over students for whom it is only an elective.

For the most up-to-date list of courses, please visit the University Courses webpage.

First Year

Required course list:

  • LPHIL4239 Introduction to Philosophy (L4, 15 credits)
  • LPHIL4227 Early Modern Philosophy (L4, 15 credits)
  • LPHIL4228 Introduction to Logic (L4, 15 credits)
  • LPHIL4230 Technology and Human Values (L4, 15 credits)

In addition, take available L4 courses from the University Courses list* to add up to 120 credits, selected with an Academic Advisor so as to support progress towards meeting all (including Core) programme requirements by the end of the third year.

Second Year

Required course list:

  • LPHIL5228 Ancient Philosophy [nb incorporates political philosophy] (L5, 15 credits)    
  • LPHIL5230 Ethics (L5, credits)    
  • In order to meet the relevant discipline learning outcomes, take at least TWO other level 5 Philosophy courses from the University Courses list*, at least one of which is in theoretical philosophy.

In addition, take available L5 courses from the University Courses list to add up to 120 credits, selected with an Academic Advisor so as to support progress towards meeting all (including Core) programme requirements by the end of the third year.

This programme is designed to enable eligible students the option to progress through their degree by studying abroad, at another global location, in the second semester of their second year. Advice and support on specific opportunities will be provided by the Academic Advisors.    

Third Year

Required course list:

  • LPHIL6237 Final Project (Philosophy) (L6, 30 credits)    
  • In order to meet the relevant programme learning outcomes, take at least FOUR other Philosophy courses (typically all at L6) from the University Courses list*.

In addition, take available courses (typically all at L6) from the University Courses list to add up to 120 credits, selected with an Academic Advisor so as to support progress towards meeting all (including Core) programme requirements by the end of the year.

Core Requirements

By completion of their degree, each student is required to have passed courses with the following attributes. (Please note: codes indicated on the course descriptors and in the University Courses list.)

All of the following:

  • Writing across Audiences and Genres
    • Writing Intensive (WI) x 2
    • Communicating in Public and Professional Contexts (CPPC)
  • Integrating Knowledge and Skills through Experience (EX)
  • Demonstrating Thought and Action in a Final Project (FP)
  • At least four of the following eight:
  • Engaging with the Natural and Designed World (ND)
  • Exploring Creative Expression and Innovation (EI)
  • Interpreting Culture (IC)
  • Conducting Formal and Quantitative Reasoning (FQ)
  • Understanding Societies and Institutions (SI)
  • Analysing and Using Data (AD)
  • Engaging Differences and Diversity (DD)
  • Employing Ethical Reasoning (ER)

Elective Pathways

Students who take the equivalent of at least THREE courses across at least TWO levels in a defined area outside of their main degree discipline requirements, may apply to receive recognition for this (e.g., in addition to BSc (Hons) Data Science on their degree certificate, a letter and transcript will include Sustainability as a pathway). Courses may not be double counted across pathways.

Entrance Requirements

Age

The University requires applicants to be at least 18 years old on 1 September in the year of entry.

 General Entrance Requirements

The University’s typical offer for undergraduate study is AAB at A Level, 35 points or 6,6,5 in Higher Level (HL) subjects in the International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma, or the equivalent.  A Level General Studies, Critical Thinking, Thinking Skills and Global Perspectives are not accepted by the University. Students studying the Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) alongside three A Levels may be eligible for an alternative offer. For the IB, the overall score of 35 points includes Theory of Knowledge and the Extended Essay and students achieving the University’s alternative offer of 6,6,5 in HL subjects must also achieve an overall pass in the IB Diploma for entry to our programmes.

 If English is not an applicant’s native language, they will need to demonstrate proficiency in English in order to study at the University. A minimum IELTS score of 6.5 overall with 6.0 in each sub-test, or equivalent is required.  For a list of equivalencies, please see here.

Specific Entrance Requirements

None.

Recognition of Prior Learning

Where a student wishes to apply for the recognition of prior learning on the basis of certificated or experiential learning, they should follow the University’s Recognition of Prior Learning Policy.

Learning Outcomes

By completion of the programme:

Knowledge and Understanding

K1c Demonstrate sound knowledge and sophisticated understanding of key questions and debates in core areas of philosophy.
K2c Show detailed engagement with texts and theories from the history of philosophy.
K3c Show knowledge and understanding of logical symbols, concepts, and patterns of inference.

Subject Specific Skills

A student will be able to: 

S1c Clarify, situate, and synthesise philosophical ideas and arguments from a variety of periods and traditions.
S2c Engage critically with unfamiliar material: identify and show fluency with a range of inference patterns; employ philosophical devices to articulate, challenge, and develop alternative positions.
S3c Apply the devices of formal logic to express or develop lines of argument.

Transferable and Employment Skills

A student will be able to:

T1c Communicate persuasively across audiences and genres, conveying academic materials to both specialist and non-specialist audiences using a range of formats and techniques.
T2c Research and study creatively, independently, and reflectively, applying advanced knowledge and skills to unfamiliar or wider world challenges or contexts.
T3c Display an advanced level of technical proficiency in written English and competence in applying scholarly terminology, so as to be able to apply skills in critical evaluation, analysis and judgement effectively in a diverse range of contexts.

All of the above learning outcomes are mapped to the relevant QAA Subject Benchmark threshold statements, see Appendix A.

For a mapping of courses to learning outcomes, see Appendix B.

For the Exit Awards, see Appendix D.

Teaching and Learning

Overview

The University aims to provide a lively, open, active, and authentic teaching and learning environment, in which students have the opportunity to connect their studies with wider interests and applications, and in which research and teaching are complementary.

An inclusive and interactive approach enables focus on the individual student, prompts and encourages independent reading and research, and hones their ability to apply their knowledge and skills in new contexts. This provides students with opportunities to  develop and demonstrate their discipline expertise in a variety of contexts, enabling them to enhance their subject specific and transferable skills. Teaching is flexible and adaptive to respond to student needs and classroom dynamics.

Approaches to increase inclusivity and experiential learning in the classroom might include:

  • Flipped classroom – study materials and formal lecture content is delivered to students outside of the contact hours. This enables the classroom time to focus on a discussion of key concepts and themes, for students to ask targeted questions to enhance their understanding, and for interactive group activities to share and widen knowledge and understanding. This might include small groups giving mini-presentations, or proposing a solution to a problem.
  • Role play / simulations – students are given scenarios / briefs in advance of the session, and possibly a specific role to play in the activity. The tutor guides the process by establishing context, releasing new material to students in the course of the activity, and providing space for reflection on the outcomes of the activity, and on the theories and concepts discussed and tested during the activity.
  • Tutor – Student co-creation: this is similar to the flipped classroom model, but relies on a stronger degree of student input at the design stage of the learning activity. The course leader still has control of overall content and direction of the course. However, weekly focus and case studies to apply and evaluate theories and concepts can be agreed collectively.

The portfolio of teaching, learning, and assessment elements each year is designed to embrace the University’s Teaching and Learning and Assessment Strategies and provide a diverse range of teaching and assessment methods, tasks, and tools.

Since the programme supports each student (in conversation with an Academic Advisor) to take a personal elective pathway through their studies, the range of teaching and learning activities and assessment types will vary student by student. A student who wants to go into postgraduate study in their main degree discipline, for example, may elect to take more Directed Study (1:1, 2:1, or small group) courses in their main discipline than a student with other interests or goals.

The teaching and learning for the programme is designed to progress steadily over three years and develop students’ conceptual sophistication and powers of application, through cumulative knowledge and experience.

The third-year culminating project or dissertation enables the student to refine their independent research and communication skills and to synthesise and develop their studies with a supervisor. 

Teaching and Learning Activities

The teaching and learning activities include:

  • Lectures / seminars / workshops
  • Directed study (1:1, 2:1, or small group teaching on specific topics)
  • Informal discussion, which may include online discussion boards, and regular faculty ‘office hours’, which are opportunities for students to drop in or sign up to explore ideas, raise questions, or seek targeted guidance or feedback, individually or in small groups)
  • Formative and summative assessment tasks
  • Independent study and research

Assessment

A dedicated Assessment Strategy supports authentic, inclusive, and experiential assessment. This includes offering students a broad range of assessment types, which support active learning. The assessment types available to students are listed in the University Assessment Strategy. Whilst it is not expected that all programmes should offer all of these different assessment types, and choice of assessment should be based on the most effective and appropriate way to test student learning, there will be a range available which empowers students to demonstrate their discipline knowledge via diverse means.
Courses at the University are assessed formatively and summatively in a variety of ways, including:

  • Written Assignment (e.g. long-form coursework essay; study report; literature review; reflective essay; dissertation)
  • Examination (e.g. open book scheduled exam; closed book exam; 24-/48-hour exam)
  • Presentation (e.g. oral presentation with accompanying slides; Viva voce)
  • Role Play (e.g Moot; consultancy simulation)
  • Practical ( e.g. lab skills assessments)
  • Artefact (e.g. piece of code or poem with an accompanying report)
  • Portfolio (students only have one final, formal deadline, but what they submit includes a series of shorter pieces created and reflected upon and revised across the course)
  • Set Exercises (e.g a series of short set exercises distributed across the course)

Feedback on formative and summative assessment tasks is provided in verbal or written forms.
Appendix C contains the programme structure and assessment summary.
The University’s Assessment Strategy can be found here.
The University’s Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards can be found here.

Teaching and Learning Environment

The teaching and learning environment includes:

  • The University’s campus has state-of-the-art teaching rooms and independent and group study spaces
  • A Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) for each course with a syllabus and range of additional resources (e.g. readings, question prompts, tasks, assessment briefs, slides or handouts, discussion boards, and sample examination papers and examiners’ reports) to orientate and engage students in their studies.
  • Northeastern University’s online library digital resources, and other online academic resources, such as JSTOR and the OED. Students are inducted on their use at the start of the programme, and wider digital literacy is reinforced and developed across their studies.
  • Students can also apply for a reader’s card to use the British Library membership and apply for membership of any of the City of London libraries. Students at the University can apply for Senate House Library membership.
  • As part of the wider teaching and learning environment, the University hosts a range of academic and social events in which students, faculty, alumni and interlocutors from outside the academy are brought together.

Research

The University is an active research and knowledge exchange community. Its programmes are designed by faculty with relevant research expertise and teaching is allocated to faculty as far as possible to align with their research expertise and interests.

All students have the opportunity to develop their research skills as they progress through the programme, culminating with the extended written assignment in their final year, when their supervisor will be on hand to provide bespoke support.

Students are invited to a range of faculty research events and, where possible and from time to time, research assistance opportunities may be made available.

Student Support and Development

Disabilities and/or Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLDs)

Students are strongly encouraged to inform the University of any medical conditions, disabilities, specific learning difficulties (SpLD) or neurological differences as soon as is practical. Students will be asked to submit supporting documentation from a doctor, clinical or educational psychologist detailing the nature of their disability and the impact it is likely to have on their studies in order to help us put in place appropriate support and accommodations. More information can be found in the Student Disability Policy. This data is managed and securely stored by Student Support and Development (SSD). At the start of the academic year, a number of talks and events are held which are designed to support and inform students with regard to mental health, disabilities, safety and learning support.

SSD meet with students as soon as possible, and preferably before the start of the academic year, to discuss their needs and draft a Learning Support Plan (LSP) which outlines the support to be provided both within the University (if appropriate) and externally. If requested by the student, the SDD will then arrange to inform relevant faculty of the student’s needs and any reasonable adjustments required. 

If a student is undiagnosed but believes they may have a SpLDS (e.g. Dyslexia) the SDD will help them to access diagnostic services. If the assessment confirms a SpLDS, the SDD will work the student in preparing a LSP and will provide advice about accessing additional funding and support through the Disabled Students Allowance, where a student may be eligible

For more information, please click here.

Employability and Careers Guidance

The core competencies embedded within this credit-bearing degree programme are designed to prepare students for public citizenship, professional success, and personal flourishing.

The University’s employability and career opportunities have been designed in collaboration with a large number of experts from inside and outside academia, to develop the attitudes, behaviours and capabilities that will prepare students for the world of work. University Careers Advisors help students to identify their career goals and create individual career plans. Students are actively encouraged to seek internships, with guidance and support given throughout the application process.

Quality Assurance and Enhancement

Award Standards

Every programme of study is developed by the faculty, utilising their subject specialists and approved by the University’s Academic Board.

Review and Evaluation Mechanisms

The University has robust procedures, as described in AQF4 Programme and Course Approval and Modifications and AQF5 Annual Monitoring and Reporting, in place to assure the quality of the programme development, delivery, and management, alongside systematic monitoring, ongoing review and enhancement of all University programmes. Enhancements are made as necessary to ensure that systems remain effective and rigorous.

The University utilises constructive feedback from a variety of sources, internal and external, to inform its decision-making process to enhance the programme and the student experience. These feedback sources are:

  • Annual Course Reviews, written by the Course Leader, are prepared to enable the Course Leader to reflect on the course, using a variety of data and student/faculty feedback to enhance the course and support the writing of the Annual Programme Review.
  • Annual Programme Reviews, written at the end of each academic year, are prepared in order to enhance individual programmes and to plan ahead.
  • Annual External Examiner Reports are prepared by the External Examiners, as appointed by the University, to confirm that a programme has been assessed in accordance with the approved documentation and that the student performance meets the appropriate academic standards.
  • Formal student feedback mechanisms consist of course questionnaires and Student-Staff Liaison Committee meetings at least once each semester, as well as annual student satisfaction surveys, including external independent surveys, such as the National Student Survey.
  • Informal student feedback is also valued by the University and this can take the form of students talking or corresponding with faculty or professional staff.  

About this document

Title: BA (Hons) Philosophy Programme Specification

Approved by: Academic Board

Location: Academic Handbook/Programme Specifications/Undergraduate

Version number Date approved Date published Owner Proposed next review date Modification (As per AQF4 & category number)
1.0 November2022 December 2022 Dr Brian Ball August 2027  
 
Referenced documents Recognition of Prior Learning Policy; Assessment Strategy; Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards; AQF4 Programme and Course Approval and Modifications; AQF5 Annual Monitoring and Reporting
External Reference Point(s) Subject Benchmark Philosophy

Disclaimer

The University has checked the information provided in this Programme Specification and will aim to deliver this programme in keeping with this Programme Specification. However, changes to the programme may sometimes be required arising from annual monitoring, student feedback, and the review and update of courses and programmes. Where this activity leads to significant changes to courses and programmes there will be prior consultation with students and others, wherever possible, and the University will take all reasonable steps to minimise disruption to students. It is also possible that the University may not be able to offer a course or programme for reasons outside of its control, for example, due to the absence of a member of staff or low student registration numbers. Where this is the case, the University will aim to inform applicants and students as soon as possible, and where appropriate, will facilitate the transfer of affected students to another suitable programme.

Copyright

The contents of this Programme Specification are the copyright of the University and all rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, such as electronic, mechanical, photocopied, recorded or otherwise, without the prior consent of the University.

Appendix A: Map Learning Outcomes to QAA subject benchmark statement: Philosophy

Threshold** Learning Outcomes
Familiarity with the writings of some of the major philosophers. K2
Familiarity with some central theories and arguments in the fields of logic, metaphysics, epistemology or philosophy of mind, broadly understood. K1, K2
Familiarity with some central theories and arguments in the fields of moral, political or social philosophy, broadly understood. K1, K2
Some appreciation of the wide range of techniques of philosophical reasoning. K3, S2, S3
An ability to identify underlying issues in various debates. S1, S2, T2
Grasp of some philosophical problems, mentioning arguments for or against proposed solutions. K1, S1
Understanding of the importance of careful interpretation of a variety of texts. K2, S1
Views on the success of standard arguments. K1
Familiarity with the use of specialised philosophical terminology. K3, S2, S3
Awareness of the nature of sound arguments and logical fallacies. K3, S2, S3
Appreciation of how generalisations can be supported or weakened by detailed discussion. K3, S2, S3
Recognition of arguments on both sides of a philosophical question. K1, S2, T2

**This is intended to mean that all students (taken over all years) graduating with an honours degree in this discipline will have achieved this

Appendix B – Map of Courses to Learning Outcomes

Knowledge and Understanding

Knowledge and Understanding
Code Course Title K1a K1b K1c K2a K2b K2c K3a K3b K3C
FHEQ Level 4
LPHIL4239 Introduction to Philosophy x     x          
LPHIL4227 Early Modern Philosophy x     x          
LPHIL4228 Introduction to Logic x           x    
LPHIL4230 Technology and Human Values x                
FHEQ Level 5
LPHIL5228 Ancient Philosophy   x     x        
LPHIL5230 Ethics   x     x        
FHEQ Level 6
LPHIL6237 Final Project     x     x      

Subject Specific Skills

Subject Specific Skills
Code Course Title S1a S1b S1c S2a S2b S2c S3a S3b S3C
FHEQ Level 4
LPHIL4239 Introduction to Philosophy x     x          
LPHIL4227 Early Modern Philosophy x     x          
LPHIL4228 Introduction to Logic       x     x    
LPHIL4230 Technology and Human Values       x          
FHEQ Level 5
LPHIL5228 Ancient Philosophy   x     x        
LPHIL5230 Ethics   x     x        
FHEQ Level 6
LPHIL6237 Final Project     x     x      

Transferable Skills

Transferable Skills
Code Course Title T1a T1b T1c T2a T2b T2c T3a T3b T3C
FHEQ Level 4
LPHIL4239 Introduction to Philosophy             x    
LPHIL4227 Early Modern Philosophy             x    
LPHIL4228 Introduction to Logic x     x          
LPHIL4230 Technology and Human Values x           x    
FHEQ Level 5
LPHIL5228 Ancient Philosophy   x           x  
LPHIL5230 Ethics               x  
FHEQ Level 6
LPHIL6237 Final Project     x     x     x

NB: Electives are typically mapped to the programme learning outcomes through the Transferable Skills.

Appendix C – Required Course Summative Assessment Summary

Code Course Title Credit Type Assessment Weighting % & Activity Type
AE1 Activity
type
AE2 Activity
type
AE3 Activity
type
FHEQ Level 4
LPHIL4239 Introduction to Philosophy 15 R 30% Pres 70% WA    
LPHIL4227 Early Modern Philosophy 15 R 30% Pres 70% WA    
LPHIL4228 Introduction to Logic 15 R 30% Set 70% Exam    
LPHIL4230 Technology and Human Values 15 R 30% Pres 70% WA    
FHEQ Level 5
LPHIL5228 Ancient Philosophy 15 R 30% WA 70% WA    
                   
LPHIL5230 Ethics 15 R 30% Set 70% Exam    
FHEQ Level 6
LPHIL6237 Final Project 30 R 25% Pres 75% WA    

As indicated in the Programme Structure in the main document above, in order to meet all programme learning outcomes, students will also take a minimum number of Philosophy electives from the University Courses list*.

Course Type:  

R = Required or O = Optional

Assessment Weighting:

AE1 = Assessment Element 1; AE2 = Assessment Element 2; AE3 = Assessment Element 3

ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY TYPE CODE
Written assignment WA
Examination Exam
Presentation Pres
Role play RP
Portfolio P
Set exercise Set
Practical skills assessment Pract
Artefact Arte

Appendix D – Exit Awards

Certificate in Higher Education:

In order for a student to be awarded a Certificate in Higher Education (Cert HE), they are required to have achieved 120 Level 4 Credits, in accordance with the University’s Academic Regulations for Taught Awards.

Knowledge and Understanding

A student will be able to: 

K1a Show some awareness and basic appreciation of key questions and debates in core areas of philosophy.
K2a Show some familiarity with texts and theories from the history of philosophy.
K3a Recognise and provide basic interpretations of logical symbols and concepts.

Subject Specific Skills

A student will be able to: 

S1a Recognise and provide basic interpretations of philosophical ideas and arguments from more than one period or tradition.
S2a Identify inference patterns and employ them with basic facility.
S3a Translate natural language arguments into basic formal logic.

Transferable and Employability Skills

A student will be able to: 

T1a Communicate clearly and appropriately to specific audiences.
T2a Study independently and effectively in a guided and structured environment.
T3a Display a developing technical proficiency in written English and an ability to communicate clearly and accurately in structured and coherent pieces of writing.

Diploma in Higher Education:

In order for a student to be awarded a Diploma in Higher Education (Dip HE), they are required to have achieved 120 Level 4 Credits and 120 Level 5 Credits, in accordance with the University’s Academic Regulations for Taught Awards.

Knowledge and Understanding

A student will be able to:

K1b Show awareness and appreciation of a range of questions and debates in core areas of philosophy.
K2b Show engagement with texts and theories from the history of philosophy.
K3b Recognise and engage readily with logical symbols and concepts.

Subject Specific Skills

A student will be able to: 

S1b Interpret philosophical ideas and arguments from a variety of periods and traditions.
S2b Engage with unfamiliar material: identify and employ a range of philosophical devices and argument forms to support or challenge stated positions.
S3b Make use of the devices of formal logic in expressing lines of argument.

Transferable and Employability Skills

A student will be able to: 

T1b Communicate clearly and persuasively to specific audiences, using a range of formats and techniques.
T2b Research and study independently and effectively, applying knowledge and skills to unfamiliar or wider-world challenges or contexts
T3b Demonstrate a sound technical proficiency in written English and skill in selecting vocabulary so as to communicate effectively to specialist and non-specialist audiences.
Print/Save PDF