What was the collaboration?
Experiential learning that serves students and society alike.
Citizens UK is a civil society organisation built on community organising, bringing local groups together to campaign on issues such as fair pay, housing and immigration. Its partnership with Northeastern University London stands alongside the University’s partnerships large commercial corporations, but with a different centre of gravity. Where those partnerships prepare students for corporate careers, Citizens UK gives students the chance to put their learning directly in the service of community organisations and the people they represent, so the benefit runs in two directions at once: students gain real experiential learning, and the skills they build, from manifesto writing to stakeholder communication, are put to work on causes with a genuine public benefit.
What was involved?
Citizens UK is built directly into taught curriculum through the political science course Political Arguments in Action. Here, the collaboration takes the form of an impact challenge centred on manifesto writing, a skill that is widely used in political practice but underdeveloped and understudied in formal research. Students begin by analysing real Citizens UK manifestos in class, using that analysis to build their own guidelines, before writing manifestos of their own, a flipped learning approach that puts practitioner material, and a practitioner’s sense of what serves the public good, at the centre of the module rather than at its edges.
The collaboration has required active shaping by the course team to keep both the student learning and the civic purpose intact. Citizens UK’s own method for developing manifesto “asks” relies on listening campaigns, in which member organisations hold one-to-one conversations with a sample of their constituents, a method rooted in genuinely hearing what a community needs. That approach is not straightforward to replicate in a classroom, since students do not have access to real constituents and formal listening campaigns would require ethics approval. Dr Dimova built additional scaffolding so students could produce manifestos without that step, giving them an approach closer to that used by political consultancies working for parties, alongside direct exposure to Citizens UK’s own grassroots method. Rather than a weakness, this gave students a way to compare a consultancy approach against one built around genuine community voice.
The partnership’s second strand runs through co-op placements and the In-the-Field Experiential Project, a credit-bearing course that runs alongside a placement with a partner organisation. The module meets once every two weeks rather than on the usual weekly timetable, which eases the workload of a full academic course so that students can give their best to the placement itself. Sessions prepare students for professional environments and bring cohorts together to share experiences across their different placements, alongside a final presentation in which each student explains and reflects on their placement.



How did students learn?
In Political Arguments in Action, learning was flipped: rather than starting from theory, students began with a small set of real Citizens UK manifestos, worked in teams to analyse them, and used that analysis to write their own guidelines for effective manifesto writing before applying those guidelines to their own work. Across the module, students learned story-writing, community-based organising, and the state infrastructure within which that organising takes place, alongside a practical grasp of how grassroots and consultancy approaches to political argument differ, and what each means for whose voice actually gets heard.
Learning through the In-the-field Experiential Project, based on the co-op or internship work experience is built around reflection alongside practice. Students carry out their placement work, then use the fortnightly sessions and a reflective assignment to connect what they are doing day to day to the wider purpose of the organisation they are working with. For students, this meant staying aware of the bigger picture at Citizens UK rather than simply completing tasks, and being intentional about how they communicate with stakeholders and supported their team. The final presentation gave them the chance to explain and reflect on their placement clearly, building confidence that they have carried into further internship applications and interviews.
Key benefits for students included:
- A genuine dual benefit: students gain real experiential learning while their work, from manifesto guidelines to placement contributions, supports the practical work of a civil society organisation.
- Exposure to practitioner methods that formal research overlooks: manifesto writing and community organising are widely used in practice but rarely taught, so students learn skills they would not otherwise encounter.
- A civic and community-focused placement route: students whose career interests lie in advocacy, policy or community development gain an industry-integrated option that matches what is available to students aiming for corporate careers.
- A credit-bearing structure built for placements: fortnightly sessions instead of a full weekly class make it realistic to combine a demanding internship with academic study.
- Stakeholder communication practice: students build and apply communication skills in a live organisational setting, with direct feedback from course staff.
- Confidence for future applications: the final presentation gives students practice in explaining and reflecting on their experience, a skill they can carry into later interviews and internships.
- Reach across disciplines: the partnership spans both taught curriculum and placements, giving students in different programmes their own route into the same civic partnership.
Student perspective
At Citizens UK, the biggest thing that helped me stay engaged beyond the task in front of me was a mix of determination and genuine appreciation for the work. If I commit to a role, even a short term one, I want to do it well, so I make a conscious effort to stay aware of the bigger picture and the people around me. Citizens UK made that easy because it is an organisation doing meaningful work for local communities, and I felt grateful to contribute to it, even for a short time.
I would recommend the In-the-field Experiential Project as a credit-bearing course. Having the course in place reduces the workload of a regular full-time class, which makes it easier to give your best to the work experience itself. The final presentation is another helpful part, as it gives you practice explaining and reflecting on your internship experience clearly and builds confidence for future opportunities.
Partner perspective
Through their placement at Citizens UK, Northeastern students learned about building people power through community organising, creating a campaign strategy with local people affected by injustice and develop the skills to target decision-makers to make social change. Northeastern students offered not just their time but their willingness to learn, and act – small contributions that, together, helped strengthen the community they were placed in.
Faculty perspective
Having Citizens UK as the experiential partner for the course Political Arguments in Action was a game changer. The students learnt the “hidden” tricks behind manifesto analysis, which span from relational meetings, to managing conflict to storytelling. No books teach you that side of political impression management and the production of political asks.
The Citizens UK partnership matters because it puts civil society on an equal footing with the corporate partners in our experiential learning offer, and because it asks something more of students than most placements do: that the work they do should genuinely serve the community it is aimed at, not just their own development.
Seeing students bring the same rigour and reflection to a Citizens UK manifesto or placement as they would to a corporate project shows that experiential learning and public benefit are not competing goals. They can be the same piece of work.


